Opinion Piece – Migrant boom’s housing bust – The West Australian

Anthony Albanese is learning the hard way that it’s much easier to promise people the world than deliver practical outcomes. Despite pledging to reduce power bills by $275, Labor’s policies have caused them to increase by 30 per cent on the east coast since May 2022. Anthony Albanese swore to implement the Uluru Statement from the Heart “in full” but his referendum was rejected by a sweeping majority in every Australian State after he refused to explain how it was going to work, what it would do, and how much it would cost. These hollow promises, to which we could add cheaper mortgages and more affordable homes, go a long way to explaining the recent nosedive in support for Labor in WA. But what Anthony Albanese didn’t say before the last election is starting to discredit him in the eyes of voters just as much as what he did. Namely, overseeing the biggest influx of immigrants this country has seen since the end of World War II. Last week’s Australian Bureau of Statistics data confirmed that is exactly what has happened on Labor’s watch. And its impact is totally unmodeled. For WA, which has now recorded the fastest-growing population in the country for four consecutive quarters, the ramifications of this are being more widely felt than any of Anthony Albanese’s policies. According to the ABS, net overseas immigration to Australia soared to 548,000 arrivals in the 12 months to September last year, the most recent reporting period. WA’s population grew to more than 2.9 million people and on current projections will exceed 3 million people by Christmas of next year — quite possibly sooner — with our annual growth rate of 3.3 per cent outstripping east coast capitals significantly. The ABS data sets, released every three months, show that WA’s population has now grown at a faster rate than any other capital city since December 2022, beginning at a 2.3 per cent growth rate. These record immigration levels have been a godsend for Jim Chalmers and Labor, as they remain the only thing keeping the national economy from entering a technical recession. For the rest of the country, however, it’s a very different story. Take housing, for example. The median price to rent a home in Perth is now a record $640 a week, up from $520 a week in December 2022. It’s a result of Perth having the most restricted rental vacancy market in the country at a crippling 0.4 per cent. The problem of finding a home has been so severe that we have seen press reports in recent weeks of Perth real estate agents leasing out rooms in empty homes for as much as $450 per week, and people paying $120 a night to sleep in someone’s backyard through Airbnb. And while WA might be copping the brunt of it, the housing crisis is well and truly a national problem. Despite the 900,000 permanent and long-term overseas arrivals who entered the country between July 2022 and December 2023, only around 265,000 new homes were built, meaning immigration is outstripping the supply of new dwellings by almost four-to-one. Thanks to an economy saddled with planning bottlenecks and Labor’s pipeline of green infrastructure projects, approvals for new homes across the country are at their lowest level in 12 years. Median house prices are at record levels in three of Australia’s capital cities, including Perth at $660,000. Anthony Albanese’s solution to this urgently pressing concern, Labor’s Help to Buy Scheme, has been treated like an afterthought. Nearly two years since Labor was elected, the legislation is still being debated in Parliament. And, unlike the Coalition’s policy of allowing first home buyers to access their super to get a foot on the property ladder, Labor’s policy will at best apply to no more than 10,000 people each year. The Help to Buy Scheme’s restrictions, such as cutting off eligibility to people with an income of more than $90,000, and capping eligible homes to roughly half the average house price in cities such as Sydney, means the policy is shuffling deck chairs as the Titanic sinks. On Labor’s own projections, it will only help 40,000 people at most over four years — that’s if it ever gets legislated. As a proud WA Senator, and long term supporter of planned immigration, I begrudge none of the nearly 100,000 people who have decided to call WA home in the past 12 months. Our country, and our State, one of the best places in the world. But unplanned, unmodeled and, most importantly, unasked-for immigration policy on this scale will only bring a loss of support for immigration, a phenomenon we are witnessing in many parts of the world. For the most successful multicultural country on earth, such an outcome would be a tragedy. And Anthony Albanese needs to remember that his first priority is to Australians, who he will have failed if he risks — as he is currently — preventing an entire generation of working Australians from owning their own home.

Transcript – Interview with Nadia Mitsopoulos, ABC Radio Perth

2 March 2024 Topics: Armaguard, ACCC, Regional Banking Inquiry E&OE   Nadia Mitsopoulos Dean Smith is a WA Liberal Senator. He has some questions to ask about this in parliament. Senator, good morning.   Dean Smith Good morning to you Nadia.   Nadia Mitsopoulos How do you see the situation that Armaguard is in now?   Dean Smith Well, I suspect we’re at the beginning and not the end of this issue. I think it is important to reassure West Australians, your listeners, that it’s the Reserve Bank of Australia’s view that there must be cash in the Australian economy and there must be access to that cash. So, people do not need to sort of unnecessarily worry that there might be restrictions on the availability of cash at post offices or at Coles or Woolworths or at the local ATM. But there are a couple of issues to be answered here. Armaguard and Prosegur, which is the other merger partner, went to the ACCC in 2022 asking for special permission to merge together in what we call cash in transit services.   The ACCC gave them that special approval as a special authorisation because as you have identified, it created a monopoly service provider in this new merged entity. Part of the ACCC’s process was to forensically examine whether or not the financial viability of this merged entity could be met and sustained. And on the basis of that, the ACCC gave permission for the merged entity to operate. And very shortly after that, the merged entity then put up their hand and said things are much more severe than we thought they were. We can’t run the business with a viable financial structure. And then went to Coles and the supermarkets and banks and others looking for a very significant cash injection originally of $190 million over three years to make the entity viable.   So, for me, a couple of important questions: Why did the ACCC find it necessary to allow the merge structure to exist given the necessary authorisations? If we are going to find ourselves in a situation where we did last week where there was a risk to cash delivery services in the economy?   Nadia Mitsopoulos At the time that permission was given, did you accept the reasoning that the ACCC was given giving and the reassurances?   Dean Smith Yes, in February of this year at the Senate estimates, I had the opportunity to ask the governor of the Reserve Bank, but also the ACCC chair, whether or not this merger proposal was properly founded in the ACCC’s merger process. They reassured me that they had gone through all the necessary due diligence and satisfied themselves that the new entity would be viable. But that doesn’t make sense now, because we know that last week Lindsey Fox made a personal injection of $10 million.  That’s after he asked others to make a $26 million injection.   Nadia Mitsopoulos Which he then rejected.   Dean Smith Which he then rejected because, because the banks and Coles and Woolies and others asked to see Armaguard’s books   Nadia Mitsopoulos And he said no.   Dean Smith And he said no.   Nadia Mitsopoulos So, what do you read into that?       Dean Smith I think that there is something going on here that deserves much greater scrutiny. In the last week of parliament prior to Easter, I had the opportunity again to inquire with the ACCC and the RBA where negotiations were up to. And they were particularly cagey with me, not wanting to reveal or respond to some of the questions that I had asked in public in Canberra. So, when we return back to the regional banking inquiry on the 16th of April, these are the same sorts of questions that I’ll be asking the RBA and the ACCC because I think there’s a very significant question to be answered here.   Nadia Mitsopoulos What is going on? Dean Smith is my guest this morning Liberal Senator for WA what do you specifically want to know?   Dean Smith I want to know what authorisations have actually been met. So, the ACCC in granting the merger to proceed would have asked Armaguard and Prosegur to comply with a number of undertakings and authorisations. I want to know, have they all been met? If they haven’t been met, why have they not been met? Secondly, I’m keen to understand what level of confidence the banks currently have, but also big retailers and organisations like Coles and Woolies and others, whether or not they are confident that cash in transit services can be sustained over the medium to longer term in this country.   Because there’s a very, very important issue for many people in Australia, despite the very significant uptake in digitization and digital payments. There are still many in our economy, people living in regional communities, the elderly, that use cash. 15% of people in Australia use cash for 80% or more of their transactions still. We also know that access to banks has been declining with bank closures.   Nadia Mitsopoulos And ATMs!   Dean Smith And ATMs closing, we know that the level of withdrawals from ATMs is also fallen significantly. So, there’s absolutely a change happening in the economy in terms of how cash is used. But as the RBA has made very, very clear, there must still always be access to cash available to people. And that’s, I suppose, at the end of the day, what am I seeking to achieve: a greater level of certainty and security that cash will be available on a day-to-day basis to people throughout the Australian economy.       Nadia Mitsopoulos Senator Dean Smith, do you have confidence that Armaguard is viable moving forward?   Dean Smith Well, I’ve not seen the books. I’ve not seen the books and they are really the questions for the RBA and…